Tag: painting

What is not to love about Renoir and Love, a new blockbuster exhibition at the National Gallery? It’s a terrific show, with plenty of ‘old friends’ to view but the curators have also assembled many paintings from America and Europe we rarely have the chance to see in London. And it helps position Renoir as the great painter he is, an an artist in a hurry, who celebrated the power of the brushstroke and loved depicting narratives and relationships in his work.

Tagged , , , , Leave a comment

Such a joy to see familiar works such as Dance at the Moulin de la Galette (1876) which is here in London from Paris for the first time, alongside lesser known works which show people engaging with one another. These paintings invite the viewer to provide the likely conversation or situation. Middle shows: Luncheon, 1875, from the Barnes Foundation in Philadelphia. The couple have just finished their meal and are clearly discussing something fascinating. You long to join them at the table. And on the right is La Grenouillere, 1869 which depicts a popular bathing spot on the River Seine, known as the camembert, for its round shape, where people gathered to party. This painting came from the National Museum of Stockholm.

Encounters between men and women are a frequent subject. This is where Renoir is such a great narrative painter. We can fill the ‘gaps’ with our own contribution and wonder just where that relationship in the painting might be heading. On the left is Secrets (1875) a couple sit close together poring over a newspaper. I can’t help thinking the appearance of the dog by her skirt was something of an afterthought! Middle is Conversation(1876) again, we are dropping in on a couple who’ve reached a very important stage in their exchange. And on the right is The Promenade (1870) and the couple (not really suitably dressed for a riverbank excursion) are navigating a steep bank and about to disappear into the shady trees.

Family provided very touching subjects for Renoir too. The sketching must have been done on the spot but I’m assuming that the paintings were completed in his studio and, to some extent, posed. But they do capture that easy closeness between parent and child. Top left is Young Mother, (1881) which echoes traditional mother and child paintings of the 16th century, Middle top is Madame Monet and her son, (1874) showing the artist’s seven year old son in a comfortable sprawl with his mother, then Woman with a Parasol and small child on a sunlit hillside (1874-6) shows his wife with a toddler.

And Renoir was famous for his nudes too. This trio shows the differing styles he adopted. On the left the figures are smoothly painted in The Great Bathers: A New Arcadia (1880s), Renoir called this painting a ‘decorative’ work. Centre is A Nymph by a Stream (1869-70) it’s an interesting combination of the ‘smooth’ and blended brushwork he moved into combined with the much freer brushwork of the earlier paintings. And on the right is Study torso, sunlight effect (1875) which is a glorious celebration of brush strokes and daubs of paint to capture the dappled light on ample flesh.

So, I’ll end with this dynamically strong self-portrait from 1875. It shows the energy which clearly pulsed within Renoir. He was described by friends as a ‘man with a hurried gait, a serious expression and distracted air’. And you can see from the vigorous brush strokes on this painting and many of his other works that he must have stabbed at the canvas, swished paint at high speed and was always eager to finish the piece he was working on and crack on with the next.

Renoir and Love is such a great show and will be hugely popular. It’s on at the National Gallery, the Sainsbury Wing, until 15th January 2027.

Keeping the spirit of summer going, the new exhibition at the Royal Academy in London: Painting the Riviera, transports the viewer to the glorious world of sunshine, deep blue sea and sky and the promise of everlasting warmth. For 100 years, artists have depicted the South of France, glorying in the quality of the light, intense colours and dynamic landscape.

Tagged , , , , Leave a comment

In the 1870s, artists who’d been busy working in Paris and the cities of northern France started gravitating towards the little-known coastal towns along the Mediterranean coast. Dazzled by the clear light and abundant sunshine, this area inspired an entirely new art movement. Suddenly, colour became light and light became colour.

Sometimes painting from their apartments overlooking the sea, artists including Monet, Renoir, Matisse, Cezanne, Bonnard and Dufy were inspired to capture the views and contrast them with domestic interiors. Above, left to right: Henri Matisse, Seated Woman, Back turned to the Open Window 1922, Pierre Bonnard, Breakfast at Le Cannet 1930, Raoul Dufy, Open Window, Nice 1928

Above: Pierre Bonnard, Panoramic vista of Le Cannet, Henri Matisse, Study for “Luxe, Calme et volupté” 1904 What’s so striking about the paintings is the artists’ desire to capture what they felt about the view rather than producing literal impressions of the view.

And it was the Riviera which helped bring the ‘pointillist’ style to the fore. Great to see this painting by Paul Signac, Women at the Well from 1892. Complementary colours placed side by side heighten one another’s effect. And on the right is Francis Picabia Saint Tropez, View of the Citadel 1909.

Then, along comes Picasso. He was familiar with the bright Mediterranean light but, after years holed up in Paris during the occupation this was a great ‘release’ for him. And he captures the spirit and freedom of this seaside place as it became a hedonistic retreat for pleasure seekers.

The modernists present very different but dynamic impressions of the same views. From left to right: Picasso, Bay of Cannes 1958, Chaim Soutine, Landscape at Cagnes, 1923, and Marc Chagall, Table before the Village, 1968.

There’s a lovely display of posters advertising the joys of the Riviera and clips from films celebrating the beautiful views. Middle is a shot of Alfred Hitchcock’s To Catch a Thief with Grace Kelly and Carey Grant and the back view of Jeanne Moreau on a hotel balcony in the film Baie des Anges.

Basically, I want to go to Riviera right now! The show is on at the Royal Academy of Art until 31 January 2027.

Richard Dadd: Beyond Bedlam – what a fascinating show at the Royal Academy. Looking at these pictures you do wonder what kind of mind conceives of such strange fairy-tale scenes and weird theatrical images. Dadd went ‘mad’ at 26, stabbed his father to death and attempted to murder another man. Declared ‘incurable’, he was sent first to Bedlam, London’s notorious home for the mentally sick and then to Broadmoor where his doctors and were caring and encouraged him to develop his art. The results are astonishing.

Tagged , , , , Leave a comment

Above is an amazing painting called Contradiction. Oberon and Titania (1854-58). It’s based on events in Shakespeare’s play A Midsummer Night’s Dream and feature’s the couple’s argument over who should adopt the ‘little changeling boy’. I’m not allowed to photograph close ups but you can see some of the detail in the picture.

Richard Dadd was a precociosly talented artist from a young age. Above is a self-portrait in oils along with studies of his family done in watercolour in 1838 when he was 21 – Dadd is top row centre. His father is top right. Having been taken on a ‘grand tour’ around eastern Europe and Egypt as a new graduate of the Royal College of Art, he started having ‘delusions’, believing himself to be the son of the Egyptian god, Osiris. On his return he murdered his father and attacked another man. Despite escaping to France he was arrested and sent back to England. First of all he stayed in the security of Bethlam – known as Bedlam – in Lambeth and then to Broadmoor, a newly established hospital for the insane.

Whilst at Broadmoor Dadd used his sketchbooks from his travels and his vivid memory to create extraordinary paintings which conjure the romance of his travels and stories from history in Egypt.

Dadd created a series entitled ‘The Passions’, depicting extremes of emotion and human motivation .

The watercolours are full of narrative detail and strange emotion. Above is a very sensitive portrait entitled Celandine which shows how delicate and carefully composed his imaginative paintings were.

On the left is Dadd’s early work depicting fairies. This one is entitled ‘Puck’, the mischievous fairy from Shakespeare’s A Midsummer Night’s dream surrounded by dancing fairies. This picture, along with other impressions of an uncanny, magical world, attracted positive attention and launched the young artist. After his travels, the disastrous mania, the murder of his father and life in a secure prison, Dadd returned to these themes in later life and painted fabulously detailed fantasy scenes .

This work, above, The Fairy Feller’s Master Stroke took ten years to paint. You can stare at it for ages and keep seeing new faces, figures and forms appearing in the textured paint.

A truly enchanting show which rightfully celebrates an extraordinary artist who, one could argue, benefitted from incarceration because it gave him time to explore his own wild imagination and he was encouraged in his art by the doctors who ‘managed’ him during his 43 years of incarceration, offering him materials and portrait commissions.

The show is on at the Jillian and Arthur M Sackler Wing at the Royal Academy of Arts on Piccadilly until 25th October 2026.

Frida: The Making of an Icon opens at Tate Modern this week. Just say this artist’s name and her image appears in your mind’s eye – mono-brow, faint moustache, direct stare and distinctive clothing and floral headdress. And what a life story she gave us – pain, paint and dedication. A natural icon in the making. What we see in this show is an extension of that reputation when interpreted by other artists.

Tagged , , , , Leave a comment

I’ve always admired Frida Kahlo. Her art is so compelling, so confronting and often full of pain, sadness and honesty. When you combine these powerful images with what we know of her life story then you have someone with true ‘iconic’ quality (a much over-used description for so many) and a reputation which has endured and grown since her death in 1954.

Above: portrait of Frida by Diego Rivera and her first self-portrait (In a Velvet Dress) from 1926.

This exhibition looks at Kahlo’s work – with an impressive collection of rarely-seen works – and then examines how she has influenced other artists who have been inspired to interpret, copy, imitate and express her work and elements of her life.

To begin with, Kahlo was known as the wife of Mexican artist Diego Rivera, ‘who also painted’. It’s clear that he considered himself the better artist yet, when you see his work in the same gallery as hers, it’s clear that she was superior. However, she coupled herself to him, and took a secondary role in their relationship. But, where his international flame has waned, hers has burned brightly, gaining momentum in the 1980s and 90s.

Proud of her Mexican heritage, Kahlo was always seen wearing traditional outfits, tehuana dresses, and four of them are presented here.

I enjoyed having the chance to view Kahlo’s self-portrait with loose hair (1947) which references traditional devotional paintings. I also, really liked this tiny painting of a ceramic sculpture of a warrior, originally found in a burial site in Coima, Mexico. She also created Oaxacan tin frame which is astounding.

This painting is quite gruesome. It’s by Peres Maldonado (after 1777) and illustrates a woman’s breast being surgically removed. She looks remarkably serene given the ghastly operation to remove cancer. This painting has been included in the exhibition because, apparently, it influenced Kahlo in the way she started presenting her self-portraits and other painted works, using text and a very graphic, illustrative style.

Having examined Kahlo’s life and work the exhibition then moves into the many ways in which her image has been interpreted and used by other artists. So, on the left is a screenprint by Richard Duardo, a mask worn by Leonora Carrington (a European friend of Frida Kahlo ) and a huge portrait of Kahlo by Mriam Schapiro using acrylic paint and collage on canvas. The collage side of this is a mix of paper and fabric. Very spectacular.

Some more ‘homages’ to Kahlo. We have an installation (left) by Amalia Mesa-Bains, using grapevines and the traditional Mexican altar dedicated to female deities; middle is Patricia Bell’s Broken Column who has bound together several corsets in the shame of a torso with an irregular vertical seam to channel a fractured spinal column. And on the right is Rocio Maldonado’s work – a female figure painted on canvas with painted wood frame.

And in the last room of the exhibition we see the way the Frida Kahlo image has been commercialised. We see her image on so many items for sale, objects to revere, admire and play with. And here is a selection of dolls representing her. There’s even a Barbie doll but she has distinctly Western features.

Would Frida Kahlo be happy with her legacy? Well, I’m sure she’ll be happy for the recognition of her work but I do wonder about the quantity of ‘pretenders’ who claim to harness her style and story for their own advancement. She was so unique and achieved so much in her short life. She reminds me of Marilyn Monroe – whose show at the National Portrait Gallery tells us a rather similar story. How quick we are to copy something striking and beautiful when really, artists will ‘borrow’ and ‘steal’ from each other but what we should really value is originality.

The show is on at Tate Modern until 3rd January 2027. Well worth a visit.

In a career lasting just ten years, Marilyn Monroe became one of the world’s most photographed women and her image is just as recognisable and revered today. She died in 1962 and would have been 100 this week. The National Portrait Gallery has staged a magnificent centenary exhibition celebrating her life in pictures.

Tagged , , , , Leave a comment

This enchanting exhibition at the National Portrait Gallery is really very moving. The first image we see is this tiny photograph, above left, of 15 year old Norma Jeane taken in a photobooth in New York. Still with her natural dark hair, the smile and the clever use of eyes is there to see. And later on, we see the image, some 20 years later, which Marilyn wanted to project as a professional star, bright blonde hair, red, red lipstick, elongated eyeliner and false lashes and the beauty spot. She was lovely looking and it’s such a tragedy that she died at the tender age of 36. However, the result is, it turns out, immortality. Marilyn will always be thought of as a beautiful talented young woman .

The ultimate cover girl, photographers found her inspiring and clamoured to invite her to be photographed. She clearly developed close relationships with many of the photographers and quickly established a degree of control of usage of the images – studying the pictures and only allowing those she approved of to be used in print. Above, you can see her jumping with the photographer Philippe Halsman.

After a career as a photographic model she gravitated to Hollywood and some great roles. She turned out to be a brilliant actress, dancer and singer. But being in front of a movie camera, and sharing a scene with other people, came with issues for her. Difficult to stay in total control of the finished image. Oh, but how enchanting she looks in her white dress as wind from the subway blows up her skirt revealing her legs and underwear. She knew exactly how powerful that image would be. The exhibition shows a montage of her best films and give us a glimpse of how luminous she looked on screen.

Marilyn Monroe’s image inspired artists before and after her death. We are all familiar with those Warhol prints (there are three of them in this show). And I was impressed to see the painting by Richard Hamilton, top right, based on photographs taken by George Barris, shortly before she died. He paints directly onto the images as contact sheets, showing the ones she approved and blotting the ones she rejected. Above middle is Ray Johnson’s collage of a pin up and on the left is a huge ‘vanitas’ by Audrey Flack painted after her death showing images of her life and the transience of her beauty.

Final shots from the George Barris shoot of Marilyn on the beach at Santa Monica. And the Last Sitting photograph by Bert Stern in 1962. She drew an x on the rejected images and took a hair pin to the colour transparencies. One is left with a sense of such sadness that all that talent was over too soon. But in its place is this remarkable immortality – she is forever young and beautiful.

The show is on at the National Portrait Gallery until 6th September 2026.

James McNeill Whistler at Tate Britain – what a treat! So great to see so many works – portraits, self-portraits, narrative paintings, landscapes and the mesmerising ‘Nocturnes’ depicting stretches of water at dusk.

Tagged , , , , Leave a comment

Loved this self-portrait of James McNeill Whistler. He’s looking quite louche and pleased with himself – blowing that little puff of cigarette smoke from his mouth and looking out at us with supreme confidence. And he was a confident painter. Interesting to learn that, having been born into a military family, he attended West Point and was expected to lead the life of a soldier but he was clearly far too free-thinking and disobedient for that world. And, as we see in the exhibition at Tate Britain, he spent every spare moment making drawings. He wanted to be an artist.

So, in his twenties he moved to Paris to live the Bohemian life as a painter, made friends with contemporary artists such as Degas and started drawing, painting and etching. Looking at his etchings it’s clear to see the influence of earlier artists such as Rembrandt. He also had a great sense of story-telling and obviously relished portrait painting.

These two portraits made in France in1859 are great examples of how he managed to capture likeness, character and the interior world of his subjects. You can see the influence of Rembrandt too.

These are BIG oil paintings. On the left is a scene set on the Coast of Brittany (Alone with the Tide) from 1861painted in the open air and full of atmosphere. The texture of the paint is impressive and really worth getting up close to this one to see how he captures the approaching waves. And on the right is a painting I really love, Wapping, which was created from a series of drawings made in the busy port on the River Thames and very much a studio piece in its complexity. The viewer’s eye is so cleverly drawn from the foreground scene of drinkers (models) in a disreputable pub on the waterfront and the jumble of ships, boats, buildings and the great metropolis in the background. You just want to sit down at that table, smell the beer and the filthy river and dream of trade and travel to far flung places.

And here she is, Whistler’s mother. How still she looks in this austere setting with an oriental fabric drape to the side, a single print on the wall behind her (the print itself is also in the exhibition) and the woman seated, solemnly, staring at something. It’s unusual to see a portrait in such severe profile and the colours are very subdued. Having enjoyed colour in his earlier work, Whistler make a point of reducing the colour to subtle tones and allows the monochrome, or grey, of his palette to dominate. It’s a large painting with a tremendous draw to it.

And here are some of the ‘Nocturnes’ the later paintings he made which capture watery scenes at dusk or by moonlight. I think there must be a warm, orangey ground underneath all those cool blues and greys because there’s a hidden warmth to the pictures. They are dreamy and compelling.

What a great show. It’s on at Tate Britain until 27th September. Well worth a visit.

We don’t get to see much contemporary art from the Asia Pacific region so it’s great that the V&A has devoted a gallery space to a show called Rising Voices: Contemporary art from Asia, Australia and the Pacific – a broad scoop of the planet featuring works from Indigenous peoples from remote islands to huge, densely populated countries.

Tagged , , , , Leave a comment

It’s quite hard to describe what, exactly, you are seeing at this show, but it was interesting and engaging to see the work of so many contemporary artists from places as diverse as Hawaii, Cambodia, India, Australia, New Zealand, the Philippines… what a great sweep of the world to try and represent!

The works, above, caught my eye because they represented people and events: La Famillle Pomare by Aline Amaru from Tahiti, Independence Celebration by Mathias Kauge from Papua New Guinea and Svay Ken’s depiction of People on 18th April 1975 when the Khmer Rouge took power in Cambodia

What’s striking is that so many of the images referenced violence, domination and occupation. These regions have been buffeted by so many of the greedy countries of the West for whom faraway lands represented an opportunity to take by force, own and exploit. So there’s a lot of that on show.

Above you can see: Pala Pothupitiye’s Kaulara Fort which gives an impression of the colonial experience in Sri Lanka, showing a fort first built by the Portuguese, captured by the Dutch and then taken over by the British. Middle is Heri Dini’s Eating Bullets, a rather ‘Guernica-like’ expression of invasion and fury and on the right is a depiction of Vietnamese planes and Pol Pot Soldiers in battle.

Good to see a variety of sculptures and crafts too. I was impressed by these three, painted dishes and everyday objects, a ceramic bust by Ah Xian from China who works in Australia, and Spikey One by Shirley Macnamara from Queensland, Australia who uses spinifex, emu features, ashes, porcupine quills and polymer.

The exhibition ends with a spectacular sculpture depicting the Phoenix Pavilion which is part of Kyoto’s Byodo-in temple complex. Made from Japanese cypress he building appears to float on water with a reflection created to mirror the building. And Montein Boonma from Thailand has created Lotus Sound, made from terracotta ‘bells’ which is very beguiling.

The exhibition is on show near the main entrance to the Victoria and Albert Museum until 10th January 2027

The magnificent Elsa Schiaparelli is having a well-deserved moment at the Victoria and Albert Museum. Working from the 1920s -50s, she was really an artist who found her way into clothes designing – and what a legacy that produced. This show, Fashion becomes Art is a fitting tribute to her astounding contribution to 20th century fashion.

Tagged , , , , Leave a comment

Above is just one example of Schiaparelli’s imaginative and playful approach to clothing. This jacket from 1938 features prancing circus horses printed on silk twill and the ‘buttons’ are enchanting little acrobats. Just brilliant. And the sort of thing any of us would love to wear today.

Here’s a portrait of Elsa wearing one of her own designs and looking so very elegant in 1930s chic. She was primarily an artist and knew many of the important artists of the day – Dali, Picasso and Jean Cocteau, Man Ray and Cecil Beaton.

Above is an early foray into clothing where Schiaparelli created a knitted sweater with the design incorporated into the knit – revolutionary at the time. And on the right is an extraordinary coat made in patchwork style with so much hand-stitching. Must have been glorious to wear.

Lovely dresses and a very glamorous evening coat. I first encountered the name of Schiaparelli when I read The Girls of Slender Means by Muriel Spark when I was a teenager. I really related to the giddy girls in their London boarding house who had little money but plenty of ambition. And, for important dates, they took turns to wear the precious Schiaparelli dress to impress their would-be boyfriends.

I love this portrait of Lady Mount Temple painted by Gluck. You would not mess with her when she’s wearing that suit.

This picture is quite hard to read because the lighting is very dark in this exhibition but it’s a huge collage of images of the dresses created in a gloriously playful way. And of course it always interests me to see an artwork involving paper in a show!

There’s a lot of art in the show too. At the top is a lobster print textile created with Salvador Dali from 1937, there’s a Picasso portrait and I loved the painted screen created with artist Marcel Vertès which depicts Commedia dell’arte characters. And below is painting by Man Ray called Fair Weather featuring a mannequin with a colourful diamond pattern, painted in 1939, just as war was approaching.

And although Elsa Schiaparelli died in 1973 her name and design house lives on under the direction of Daniel Roseberry who has been creative director Maison Schiaparelli since 2019. If you want to cut a dash on the red carpet or at a spectacular ball then this is the place to go for your outfit!

The show is on until 8th November 2026.

Lucien Freud: Drawing into Painting is a very enjoyable show at the National Portrait Gallery. I’m pretty familiar with Freud’s work but it was very special see works which are rarely exhibited and to see the relationship between his drawing (which was so fundamental to his work) and the painted pieces which followed.

Tagged , , , , Leave a comment

Right at the start of this show we are treated to a huge photograph of Freud’s studio in West London. It has the look and feel of one of his paintings and it’s quite moving to see the way he daubed the walls, furniture and floor with paint. Above is the picture and one of his later self-portraits.

Anyone familiar with Freud’s work will know how he evolved from an artist fascinated by detail and fine lines into a painter who used large, bristle brushes and created his work from bold, expressive brush strokes. I was very intrigued by the early drawings on show. The middle one, above, is a self-portrait with hyacinth drawn with conte crayon on paper. On the left is Portrait of a Young Man and on the right is The Village Boys, which is oil on canvas from 1941 and probably painted when Freud was studying at the East Anglia School.

I really liked this portrait of Cedric Morris, Freud’s tutor at the East Anglian School of Painting and Drawing. Made in the summer of 1940 when Freud was only 18. It captures Morris’s character beautifully.

There were a lot of women in Freud’s life. Some were lovers, wives, models or simply friends. Above is a selection of the ones he loved. Above left is Suzy Boyt and centre Caroline Blackwood. One the right and above are two portraits of Kitty Garman. Quite a mixture of drawing and painting – detail and broad brush strokes.

Freud’s mother, Lucie Freud, was also an important model. On the left is a very direct charcoal drawing of her from life and on the right a painting combined with a nude of Jacquetta Eliot.

Two faces you may recognise? On the left is David Hockney, centre, the late Queen Elizabeth II and on the right is Frank Paul.

His portraits always seem to capture the sitter’s thoughts. There’s a really contemplative feel to these to portraits. On the left is his daughter Bella Freud, in the centre is a nude etching and on the right is Suzy Boyt – the painting is entitled Girl Smiling.

The show is on at the National Portrait Gallery until 4th May 2026.

A blockbuster show at Tate Britain celebrates two of the the UK’s most acclaimed artists. Born a year apart, JMW Turner (1775-1851) and John Constable (1776-1837) both pushed their art into entirely new aesthetics and left a lasting legacy in the development of British art, paving the way for the Impressionist’s movement and everything that followed.

Tagged , , , , Leave a comment
Turner, self portrait
Portrait of John Constable by his contemporary Ramsay Richard Reinagle.

The works of Turner and Constable must be amongst some of the most recognised images in art history. Say the words Flatford Mill or A misty sunset in Venice and most of us will conjure the familiar bucolic image of a Suffolk Mill with a horse and cart or the beauty of Venice seen through a haze of cloud and watery sunshine. These works are amazing. But the history of these two artists is more entwined and their approach more similar than I had realised. This show, entitled Rivals and Originals, charts their artistic development as contemporaries and adversaries.

Both Turner and Constable were dedicated to art from an early age. Turner, you could argue, had the more difficult journey – the son of a barber based in Covent Garden, London, he demonstrated his skills at an early age and his father did his best to support his son’s desire to paint but he was not of the class expected to choose art as a career. Constable was born into middle class comfort in Suffolk and had to convince his family that he did not want to follow a conventional profession but devote his life to art. The pair developed their styles through study of Old Masters and a desire to push a narrative element into their art while recording contemporary life.

Sometimes it’s hard to differentiate between them – just look at these two, above. On the left is Turner’s Snow Storm – Steam-boat off a Harbour’s Mouth and on the right is Constable’s swift oil sketch called Rainstorm over the Sea. Both of them were fascinated by the power of nature and the constantly changing sky and weather conditions. They spent all their time sketching landscapes and painting the scene directly onto whatever surface they brought with them.

Both must have spent hours observing clouds in their infinite variety and using immediate sketches to dramatic effect. On the left is a selection of cloud studies by Constable and on the right is Turner’s massive painting Snow Storm: Hannibal and his Army Crossing the Alps.

My takeaway from the show, apart from having thoroughly enjoyed it, was the chance to see the evolution of these two artists from detailed work, which might be as literal and accurate as possible, towards a much freer, expressive way of working. Both appear to have created their work at speed, using wonderful gestural swishes of paint or urgent daubs of white and black to denote drama and impact. They are both glorious. This is a wonderful show and well worth seeing.

It’s on at Tate Britain until 12 April 2026.